By BRIAN MELLEY, Related Press
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The California Supreme Court docket rejected a lawsuit Wednesday that sought to overturn a poll measure that makes app-based ride-hailing and supply drivers impartial contractors as an alternative of staff eligible for advantages and job protections.
Justices declined to listen to the case introduced by drivers and unions against the measure. The case will be filed in a decrease court docket.
The lawsuit claimed the measure was unconstitutional as a result of it limits the facility of the Legislature and excludes drivers from being eligible for staff’ compensation.
Proposition 22 handed in November with 58% assist and shielded corporations like Uber and Lyft from a brand new state labor regulation that will have required app-based providers to deal with drivers as staff and never impartial contractors.
It was the costliest poll measure in state historical past with Uber, Lyft and different providers placing $200 million behind the trouble to undo a regulation that had been aimed squarely at them by labor-friendly Democrats. Unions, who joined drivers within the lawsuit, spent about $20 million to problem the proposition.
When the lawsuit searching for speedy evaluation was filed straight with the Supreme Court docket final month, Mary-Beth Moylan, affiliate dean of McGeorge Legislation College in Sacramento, mentioned the primary problem can be getting the court docket to take the case.
Moylan mentioned the excessive court docket might merely kick the case to a decrease court docket if it felt there was no urgency to it and there have been factual — not simply authorized — points to weigh first.
Many drivers for the providers had opposed the measure as a result of they needed to take care of the pliability to set their very own schedules.
“We’re grateful, however not shocked, that the California Supreme Court docket has rejected this meritless lawsuit,” mentioned Jim Pyatt, a Modesto retiree who drives for Uber, in a press release from a gaggle that helps Proposition 22. “We’re hopeful this can ship a powerful sign to particular pursuits to cease attempting to undermine the desire of voters.”
Opponents of the referendum had mentioned the businesses exploited drivers and the poll measure would deny them advantages required for a lot of kinds of different staff.
The events who introduced the case mentioned they had been upset and would proceed to problem the measure however didn’t say how or if they might refile the case.
“Make no mistake: we aren’t deterred in our battle to win a livable wage and primary rights,” plaintiff Hector Castellanos mentioned in a press release from Proposition 22 opponents. “We’ll take into account each possibility accessible to guard California staff from makes an attempt by corporations like Uber and Lyft to subvert our democracy and assault our rights with the intention to enhance their backside traces.”
Proposition 22 granted the supply providers an exemption from AB5, a landmark labor regulation that will have required offering drivers with protections like minimal wage, extra time, medical health insurance and reimbursement for bills.
Uber and Lyft had challenged AB5, which threatened their enterprise mannequin, in court docket. They threatened to go away the state if voters rejected the measure.
Underneath the measure, drivers stay impartial contractors exempt from mandates comparable to sick go away and staff’ comp however are presupposed to obtain “different advantages,” together with a assured minimal wage and subsidies for medical health insurance in the event that they common 25 hours of labor every week.
Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.